Every few years a group with a mobile activity and a genuine appetite for relocation asks us to compare the Canary Islands Special Zone with the international business centre of Madeira. The question is usually framed as a rate comparison, and it is almost never a rate question. Both regimes exist because European Union State aid law admits them as regional aid for remote, structurally disadvantaged territories. Both are conditioned on employment and effective activity in the territory, and on investment as well, although both let additional jobs take its place, automatically in Madeira and by authorisation in the Canary Islands. Both restrict the range of admissible activities and both limit the amount of income that can shelter under the reduced treatment. The rate is the least differentiated part of the analysis. What differs is the legal environment around it, and whether the group can credibly run a business from the island in question.
Two regimes with the same legal parentage
Neither regime is a loophole, and neither is a discretionary favour granted by a national tax authority. Both are regional operating aid for outermost regions of the Union, and both now sit inside the Commission’s General Block Exemption Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 651/2014. Its Article 15(4) requires operating aid schemes in outermost regions to compensate for the additional operating costs caused by the permanent handicaps of those regions, where the beneficiaries have their economic activity in the region, and provides that the annual aid per beneficiary under all operating aid schemes implemented under the Regulation may not exceed one of three ceilings: 35 per cent of the gross value added, 40 per cent of the labour costs or 30 per cent of the turnover generated in the region. The Spanish statute ties both its registration window and its period of benefit to that Regulation, and the Commission recorded in 2020 that Portugal had been implementing Madeira’s successor regime, Regime IV, under it since 1 January 2015. That parentage explains almost everything about how they behave in practice. Because they are aid, they carry conditions that look like industrial policy rather than tax policy: hire people, invest capital, carry on an admissible activity, remain registered, report. Because they sit inside an EU framework, they are defensible in a way that unilateral national regimes are not, for as long as they are applied as that framework requires. And because the framework runs for defined periods, the regimes are reset with it. Article 29 of the Spanish law limits new registrations to the end of the validity of the Regulation, or of the rule that replaces it, lets the benefits run for six years after it, and makes the continuation of the zone subject to the periodic reviews of the Commission; Madeira admits entities licensed until 31 December 2026 and taxes them at its reduced rate until 31 December 2033. That is a structural feature a CFO should price into any decision with a long horizon.
The practical consequence is that these regimes are not tax planning in the sense that phrase is normally used. They are relocation decisions with a fiscal component. A group that treats them as the former will fail the conditions; a group that treats them as the latter will usually find that the fiscal component was not the hardest part of the exercise.
What the conditions actually require
The Canary Islands regime is set out in article 31 of Law 19/1994 on the Economic and Fiscal Regime of the Canary Islands. Only newly created companies and branches can be entered in the official register of Canary Islands Special Zone entities, and, save for the investment exception discussed below, only if they meet every requirement in article 31.2. The entity needs its registered office and place of effective management in the islands, and at least one director, or for a branch a legal representative, resident there. Its corporate object must consist of activities listed in the annex to the law, although other activities may be carried on through a separate branch that keeps separate accounts and does not enjoy the zone benefits. Within two years of registration it must invest at least 100,000 euros in Gran Canaria and Tenerife, or 50,000 euros on the other five islands, in tangible or intangible fixed assets located in the zone and used in its activity there, subject to the further conditions in the same letter. Within six months of registration it must create at least five jobs in Gran Canaria and Tenerife, or three on the other islands, as net creation where the same activity was carried on before, and keep its average annual headcount at no less than that number while it enjoys the regime. It must also file a descriptive report on its planned activity, whose content then binds it unless the zone’s governing council authorises a change. The Madeiran regime, in article 36-A of the Portuguese Tax Benefits Statute, admits entities licensed between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2026. It requires them to start activity within six months of licensing, or within one year for industrial activity and maritime or air transport, and to meet one of two eligibility requirements: one to five jobs created in the first six months of activity together with an investment of at least 75,000 euros in tangible or intangible fixed assets in the first two years, or six or more jobs created in the first six months.
The important point is not the arithmetic of the thresholds, which changes, but their nature. Investment and jobs are partly interchangeable in both places. Madeira’s six-job option asks for no investment at all, and in the Canary Islands the governing council of the Consorcio de la Zona Especial Canaria may authorise registration, or continued registration, without the investment, after a report from its technical commission, where the jobs to be created and the average annual headcount exceed the minimum in article 31.2. What neither regime offers is a one-off entry ticket, although the consequence of letting headcount fall differs. In the Canary Islands the headcount created must be kept as an annual average for as long as the regime is enjoyed, so an entity that meets the employment condition at registration and then quietly reduces headcount has not merely underperformed; it has stopped qualifying. Article 52 of the Spanish law provides that a breach of any article 31 requirement costs the zone benefits, with effect for corporate income tax in the tax period in which the breach occurs, without prejudice to revocation or cancellation of the registration; where the breached requirement is the investment, the entity also pays the difference between the tax charged in earlier periods and the tax the general rate would have produced on its whole taxable base, with late-payment interest. In Madeira the ceiling on the income taxed at the reduced rate is set each year by the number of jobs the entity maintains in that year, under article 36-A(4) and (5), so a fall in headcount can lower the ceiling.
Madeira supplies the precedent for the other exposure. In Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414, adopted on 4 December 2020 and upheld on Portugal’s action by the General Court in Case T-95/21 and, on appeal, by the Court of Justice in Case C-736/22 P, the Commission found that Portugal had implemented the previous Madeira regime, Regime III, in breach of the Commission decisions that authorised it, because the reduced rate reached profits that were not shown to derive from activity effectively and materially performed in Madeira, and because the controls did not verify the accurate calculation of the jobs held or the link between those jobs and such activity. It ordered Portugal to recover the aid found incompatible from the beneficiaries, with compound interest from the date the aid was put at their disposal. Aid recovery is a different kind of exposure from an ordinary tax reassessment, and should be modelled as such.
There is also a second, quieter condition that neither statute states in these terms: the activity has to be one you can actually perform on the island. Employment conditions are not satisfied by nominal contracts. They are satisfied by people who work there and do something that an inspector can recognize as the business. Madeira’s article 36-A(5) now counts employees who are tax resident in the region, who carry out their activity there, or who work or crew on vessels on the Madeira International Ship Register, with part-time staff counted proportionally and certain agency, seconded and multi-employer staff excluded.
A special economic zone does not give you a lower rate. It gives you a lower rate on income that a real business, staffed by real people, has genuinely earned in a place most of your executives have never visited.
Eligible activities and the limit on the benefit
Both regimes define admissible activity, in different ways. The Spanish law works from an annex of activities identified by NACE code; the Portuguese article gives a list of activities introduced by the word designadamente, meaning among others, followed by a list of exclusions. Manufacturing, transport and logistics, wholesale trade, information technology and a range of professional and support services appear in both. Financial and insurance activity has no code in the list of the Spanish annex and is excluded in Madeira, save for the holding activity discussed below, and both regimes keep intra-group headquarters and management consulting services, NACE classes 70.10 and 70.22, outside the benefit. Holding companies are where the two texts differ. Madeira’s article 36-A(9) admits an entity whose main activity is the management of non-financial shareholdings, at the reduced rate and within the annual limits. The list of codes in the Spanish annex does not name holding activity, but the annex also preserves the activities of the list in Royal Decree-law 2/2000 that dropped out only because of the move to the NACE Rev.2 classification; that earlier list covered NACE division 74, other business activities, with intra-group coordination centres excluded, and earlier wordings of article 44 set specific base limits for, among others, the management of holding companies. The Spanish annex therefore does not settle the point on its own, whereas the Portuguese statute settles it expressly. This is deliberate. Regional aid is meant to create economic activity in a peripheral territory, not to relocate a balance sheet.
Both regimes also limit the benefit. The special rate is 4 per cent in the Canary Islands and 5 per cent in Madeira, but neither rate automatically reaches the whole profit. In the Canary Islands it applies only to the share of the taxable base that arises from operations carried out materially and effectively in the zone, calculated under article 44, and within that share to no more than 1.8 million euros of base for an entity meeting the minimum job creation, plus 500,000 euros for each further job up to 50 jobs. Article 44.6 then subjects all of it, and any job creation beyond 50, to a further ceiling under which the tax saved against the general corporate rate may not exceed 30 per cent of the entity’s net turnover. For these purposes, job creation means the net number of jobs created in the geographic area of the zone since the entity’s registration, excluding, where applicable, the incorporation of a previous workforce. In Madeira the reduced rate applies, for activities other than industrial activity in the industrial free zone and licensed maritime and air transport, whose income from carrying passengers or cargo between Portuguese ports is excluded by article 36-A(1)(b), only to income from operations with entities in the zone or with non-residents of Portugal other than their permanent establishments in Portugal outside the zone; it is confined to taxable income within ceilings that rise with the jobs maintained each year, from 2.73 million euros for one or two jobs to 205.5 million euros for more than 100; and the benefit is further subject to one of the annual limits in article 36-A(3), set by reference to value added, labour costs or turnover in Madeira. Income outside those limits falls back to the ordinary corporate income tax. This single feature does more than any other to discipline the analysis, because it means the benefit does not scale with profit; it scales with the size of the operation you are willing to build. A group projecting a large margin from a small island team will find that most of that margin is taxed under the ordinary rules of Spain or Portugal. That is the design working as intended.
Where the two diverge: legal environment
The Canary Islands operate inside the Spanish legal and administrative system: Spanish corporate law, Spanish general tax law, the Spanish inspection culture and the Spanish courts. Madeira operates inside the Portuguese system, which is a different body of company law, a different procedural framework and a different administrative temperament. Neither is better in the abstract. What matters is which system your advisers, your auditors and your general counsel can operate in without a translation layer at every step.
Language is not a trivial consideration. Working English is common in both places at professional level, but the underlying statutes, filings and correspondence are in Spanish and Portuguese respectively. A group with an existing Iberian footprint, Spanish-speaking finance staff and Spanish counsel already engaged will find the Canary Islands materially easier to run, and the reverse is true for a group with a Portuguese base. This is the sort of factor that never appears in a comparative rate table and reliably determines whether the structure survives its third year.
Connectivity and ecosystem differ in character rather than in quality. The Canary Islands have depth in logistics, industrial and maritime activity, proximity to West Africa and a substantial resident population. Madeira has a long-established international services community, an experienced local professional sector and its own shipping register. A manufacturing or distribution operation and an international services operation will not naturally point to the same island.
The personal dimension, and its limits
Spain’s inbound expatriate regime is frequently raised in the same conversation, and it should be kept firmly separate. It is an optional personal income tax regime under article 93 of the Spanish Personal Income Tax Law, available to individuals who become Spanish resident as a result of moving to Spain and who meet the conditions of that article, among them not having been Spanish resident in the five previous tax periods and moving for one of the reasons it lists, such as an employment contract or appointment as a company director. It runs for the tax year of the move and the five following years, and it applies a rate of 24 per cent up to 600,000 euros and 47 per cent above, with a separate scale for the income the article treats as savings. It can improve the position of the executives you need to move, but it does nothing to the taxation of the company and is not a substitute for the zone conditions. Confusing the two is the most common analytical error we see in this area.
How a zone entity sits inside a Dutch-headed group
Most groups reaching this question already have, or intend to have, a Netherlands holding platform above the operating layer. The interaction is straightforward but not automatic. Dividends and capital gains from a qualifying Spanish or Portuguese subsidiary will ordinarily fall within the Dutch participation exemption, provided the minimum participation is held and the subsidiary is not a low-taxed passive investment; the motive, subject-to-tax and asset tests are precisely where a reduced-rate zone entity deserves attention rather than assumption, and we set out the mechanics in our note on the participation exemption. The exemption is mandatory and symmetrical, so a group cannot elect into or out of it to suit a particular year. A zone entity carrying on a genuine operating business with staff and assets is a different proposition from a lightly staffed vehicle holding investments, and the tests are designed to distinguish between them.
Transfer pricing is the second point of contact and usually the more demanding one. Any margin recognized in a low-taxed island entity has to be supported by the functions performed, the assets used and the risks assumed there. Dutch law imposes an arm’s length obligation with documentation and no threshold, as discussed in our note on the article 8b obligation, and the Spanish and Portuguese authorities apply the same standard from the other side. The zone benefit and the transfer pricing file are the same conversation.
Third, substance on the island does not create substance at the top. A Dutch holding company still needs its own board, its own decision-making and its own operational footprint. And where the group reaches the revenue threshold of the global minimum tax, which under Article 2 of Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 is annual revenue of 750 million euros or more in the consolidated financial statements in at least two of the four preceding fiscal years, a reduced island rate may simply produce a top-up tax, collected either by the island’s own member state, where it has elected a qualified domestic top-up tax under Article 11, or elsewhere in the group under the Directive’s other rules. That converts the exercise into a question about where the tax is paid rather than whether it is paid. Cross-border arrangements may also fall within the mandatory disclosure rules, an obligation of the intermediary or, failing that, of the taxpayer.
The criterion that survives contact with reality
The zone that works is the one where the group can genuinely operate. If the plan is a logistics or light manufacturing operation with Spanish-speaking management and Iberian customers, the Canary Islands are the natural candidate. If the plan is an international services operation with an existing Portuguese relationship and a maritime component, Madeira is. If neither island can plausibly host the people who will do the work, neither regime is available in any meaningful sense, whatever the headline rate says.
The Dutch position is worth stating plainly for calibration. Under article 22 of the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act 1969, corporate income tax in 2026 is 19 per cent on the first 200,000 euros of taxable profit and 25.8 per cent on the excess, and it comes with no employment condition, no investment condition, no activity list, no special register and no aid recovery risk. For a group that cannot credibly move operations to an Atlantic island, that comparison is not close, because the zone rates are available only to operations that meet the zone conditions.
Montclare structures and operates Dutch and cross-border platforms for international groups. Our services are set out on our services page.
This article is informational and does not constitute tax, legal or investment advice. Each engagement is subject to scope and applicable regulation.