Skip to content
MONTCLARE
CAPITAL PARTNERS
CONTACT
Real Estate Asset ManagementTransfer PricingInternational Tax StructuringFinancingInternational DesksLeadershipPrivate PublicationsContact
Special Economic Zones

The 1970s Hotel as a Tax Opportunity: Refurbishment Under the RIB

Alfonso Martínez RuizFounder and Chief Executive Officer, Montclare Capital Partners · Published October 2026

The Balearic Islands have been saying the same thing for more than a decade: not more beds, better assets. The special tax regime introduced for tax periods beginning between 2023 and 2028 is written in exactly that direction. If an investor’s thesis is to buy old hotel stock, reposition it and raise revenue per stay, the thesis is aligned with the islands’ public policy, and when that happens tax stops being an obstacle and becomes part of the funding.

The instrument is the RIB, the Balearic investment reserve: a reduction of up to 90 per cent of the undistributed profit of a Balearic establishment, invested within three years in a closed list of assets. Hotel refurbishment is the use the legislator had most clearly in mind. Tourism is one of the five uses admitted both for land and for property that is let, and the general asset route catches almost everything else a hotel buys.

Three ways in

The first door is land. Point 4.A of section Four of the seventieth additional provision of Law 31/2022 admits land, built on or not, in five cases, and one of them is tourism activity under the Balearic Tourism Act 8/2012 where the acquisition is made in order to refurbish a tourist establishment. Article 6 of Royal Decree 710/2024 ties the terms tourism activity and tourist establishment to the definitions in that Act, so a licensed hotel, aparthotel or tourist apartment block is inside and an unlicensed villa is not.

The second door is letting. A company that owns the property and leases it to an operator may apply the reserve only in the situations listed in point 8 and article 15 of the Regulation, and the first of them is being a tourism undertaking under Act 8/2012. The owner-lessor must itself hold that status; the lessee cannot be a related party under article 18.2 of the Corporate Income Tax Act; and the lease cannot be a finance lease. An owner-operator structure avoids the question. A propco and opco split inside the same group does not pass it.

The third door is the wide one: ordinary operating investment. Everything a hotel buys that constitutes a fixed asset located and used in the islands and assigned to its activity enters through the general route, with no need to pass through the land gateway at all. Kitchens, air conditioning, the spa, lifts, energy installations, furniture, fittings and equipment, booking technology, even used furniture, provided the seller did not use it for its own RIB. The full list is set out in the line by line guide to what the RIB will fund.

What counts as refurbishment

The law defines refurbishment works, for the sole purpose of including the land value in the materialisation, as actions aimed at the renovation, extension or improvement of tourist establishments, provided they meet the conditions to be recognised in tangible fixed assets as a higher value of the property under accounting rules. Article 6.2 of Royal Decree 710/2024 repeats the definition and anchors it in the Spanish General Accounting Plan.

That sentence is the operative point of the whole regime for hotels: the accounting decides the tax outcome. Works booked as repairs and maintenance are expensed and materialise nothing. Works capitalised as a higher value of the building materialise the reserve. The boundary is not a tax election; it follows the accounting standard on whether the expenditure extends useful life, increases capacity or improves productivity. A like-for-like replacement of bathroom tiles is maintenance. Reconfiguring thirty rooms into twenty suites with new services is an improvement. The grey zone in between is where the capex plan and the accounting policy have to be written together, with the auditor, before the works start.

A worked example. A Balearic company buys a 1970s hotel for 12,000,000 euros, of which 4,000,000 euros is allocated to land and 8,000,000 euros to construction. It spends 6,000,000 euros on refurbishment capitalised as a higher value of the property, 1,500,000 euros on furniture, fittings and equipment, and 400,000 euros on a self-consumption solar installation. The capitalised works, the equipment and the solar array qualify through the general and environmental routes, 7,900,000 euros in total, with a five year holding period. The land value of 4,000,000 euros is included only because the acquisition was made in order to refurbish, and it carries ten years. Whether to materialise against the land at all is a decision, not an automatic consequence, and for most funds the answer is no.

The reserve the hotel can actually fund

The reduction is capped at 90 per cent of undistributed profit from the Balearic establishment, under point 2. A repositioned hotel generating 800,000 euros of undistributed operating profit can fund a reserve of 720,000 euros and, at the 25 per cent general rate in article 29 of the Corporate Income Tax Act, save 180,000 euros of tax in that year.

The ceiling arrives quickly. Article 30.3 of the Regulation measures the aid as the tax rate multiplied by the reduction, and article 29 subjects it to the de minimis limit in Regulation (EU) 2023/2831: 300,000 euros per single undertaking over any three year period, related companies counted together. At 25 per cent that corresponds to about 1,200,000 euros of cumulative reduction over three years. Against a 7,900,000 euro capex programme the reserve funds a fraction; what it does is convert a tax bill into equity in the building while the hotel ramps up. Point 10 helps the timing: works completed before the profit arrives can be treated as anticipated investments against reserves funded in the same year or the three following, if reported with the return for the year of the works.

Two other rules shape the arithmetic. The reduction cannot be combined, for the same assets, with the Chapter IV deductions of the Corporate Income Tax Act, and any part of the works paid for by a public subsidy does not count. A hotel that takes a regional energy grant for the solar array materialises only the unsubsidised part.

The energy piece

Installations and equipment for self-consumption of renewable energy converted into electricity are a qualifying investment in their own right, under article 8.1.b of the Regulation, and they do not even have to be assigned to the activity. In an archipelago with high energy costs and growing sustainability pressure on hotel stock, the photovoltaic array on the roof can be operating savings, a commercial argument and materialisation of the reserve at the same time.

The condition is a certificate of validation from the Balearic environmental authority, issued before the filing deadline of the last tax period in which materialisation is still possible. If the certificate does not arrive in time, point 14 applies and the reduction is reversed with interest. The application therefore belongs on the critical path of the refurbishment programme from day one, alongside the building licence, not as an afterthought when the return is being prepared.

Jobs, the second year and the ramp-up

A refurbished hotel that reopens with more staff can add the employment route. Point 4.B counts job creation directly related to the investment, occurring within six months of the works entering into operation, measured as the increase in average headcount across all the company’s Balearic establishments against the previous 12 months. The increase must be held for five years, three for small entities under article 101, and it is valued for only the first two years at the average cost of gross salary plus mandatory social security of the increase.

For a hotel, the useful feature in article 11 of the Regulation is that the new positions need not be filled by the newly hired people. Promoting the existing team into the reopened wing and hiring at the entry level counts the net increase. Seasonality cuts the other way: the comparison is of averages on a full-time equivalent basis, so a longer season adds headcount in the measure and a shorter one loses it. Holding the increase for five years means holding the season.

The periods that shape the exit

Five years in operation for installations, works and equipment. Ten years for land, if the land was included. Shares in a Balearic company, where the investment went through the subscription route, five years. An exit inside those windows triggers the integration of the reduced amounts into the tax base of the year of the breach, with late payment interest and possible penalties, as the Spanish tax authority’s 2024 corporate tax manual sets out.

The exit can be designed. A sale of the Balearic company’s shares by its Dutch or Luxembourg parent does not move the assets out of the company, so the holding periods keep running inside the target and the buyer inherits them with full disclosure in the notes to the accounts. The price reflects that. A sale of the hotel itself within five years does break the condition. For a fund with a five year horizon, the answer is usually to materialise against works and equipment that will be more than five years old by the exit, leave the land out, and sell shares rather than bricks. For a family office holding for a generation, the ten year land period costs nothing. The same analysis applies, under a different and uncapped regime, to hotel investment in the Canary Islands, and the comparison is often a hotel group’s first question.

The question that always comes up

What if I buy a villa and let it to tourists? The answer depends on the owner’s status as a tourism undertaking under Act 8/2012, on the licensing of the property as a tourist establishment, on the absence of any relationship with the lessee, and on whether there is a real business organisation behind it. It is not answered by the fact that the guests are tourists. In most cases the honest answer is no, and the rules on land and real estate under the RIB explain why property held as a store of value sits outside the regime. It is a question that has to be answered in writing before buying. If the answer is no, the plan is still a plan; it is simply worth less than the seller said.

Where the repositioning is won or lost

A hotel repositioning under the RIB is won or lost at the intersection of three documents: the works programme, the accounting policy and the capital structure. The first fixes when each line enters into operation and so when it materialises. The second decides which lines are capitalised and so which lines count. The third decides who owns the company, for how long, and what the exit looks like against five and ten year clocks and a ceiling shared across the group. Our Iberia, Balearic and Special Zones desk aligns the three before the deposit is paid, with the accounting classification run with our tax partner in Palma, so that the islands’ preference for better assets becomes a line in the investor’s own returns.

SPEAK TO US

Thirty minutes, no obligation

If something here applies to your group, the useful next step is usually a conversation rather than more reading. Leave your address and we will come back to you.

We use your address only to reply. Nothing else. See our privacy notice.
← ALL PUBLICATIONS
BEGIN A CONFIDENTIAL CONVERSATION Prefer to talk? Book a 30-minute call